"Particularly given the risks and expenses that further litigation would pose in this case, this is an excellent result for the Class," the plaintiffs said.ĪMD's Bulldozer processors launched in 2011, largely targeting content creators and gamers with high clock frequencies and cores. The plaintiffs argued in the filing that the settlement figure is "significantly more than 50 percent of the value of their certified claims had they prevailed at trial." The other impacted Bulldozer processors include the FX-8320, FX-8350, FX-8370, FX-9370 and FX-9590. That is significantly lower than the advertised $266 and $221 price tags of the FX-8150 and FX-8210 processors, respectively, which are among the SKUs applicable for the settlement. District court seeking approval of the settlement. While we believe the allegations are without merit, we also believe that eliminating the distraction and settling the litigation is in our best interest,” an AMD spokesperson said.īusinesses and individuals who purchased AMD's Bulldozer processors while residing in California or after visiting the chipmaker's website could be eligible for a part of the settlement, which would work out to $35 per chip if 20 percent of the settlement class files a claim, according to the plaintiffs' Aug. “AMD is pleased to have reached a settlement of this lawsuit. ![]() The deal, if approved, would release AMD of any claims. District Court for Northern California in San Francisco. The settlement is now awaiting approval before the U.S. The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company confirmed to CRN it has settled the lawsuit with plaintiffs Tony Dickey and Paul Parmer. AMD has reached a $12.1 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit alleging the chipmaker falsely advertised the number of cores in its Bulldozer processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |